The Myth of Notre Dame

by dave on March 8, 2010

Twice in the last three days, I have listened to someone talk about Notre Dame.

While this in itself, would drive me to seriously contemplate the inside of my oven, what has really annoyed me is the revisionist history that seems to have occurred in regards to the Notre Dame Fighting Irish football team.

On Saturday night, I was watching the UNC/Duke basketball game and with Duke having the game well in hand late in the game, Dick Vitale started talking about the general hatred people feel toward Duke.

SIDEBAR #1: Am I the only one that believes this year’s UNC team definitively proves one of two things: 1 – High school basketball scouting and recruiting rankings are completely flawed or 2 – Roy Williams is the most overrated coach in the country. Has a team of more highly regarded players, playing for one of the most respected coaches in the country ever been worse? Is Roy Williams the Larry Brown of the NCAA? He is great at leading great players but will never have a team overachieve above its talent level?

In Vitale’s warped, frozen in time view of the world, Duke is hated due to their great successes. Disregarding that Duke has been the surest early round upset pick in March Madness since Roy Williams left Kansas (see??), Dick thinks all of us out here in sportsfan world hate Duke because of their consistent success.

That may be debatable but the comparison that Vitale used was that Duke engenders the same hatred that Notre Dame does in football, because of their continued success.

For the record, Vitale did not mention his conflict of interest that his daughter attends Notre Dame and he thinks South Bend is the only place north of Cameron Indoor that will be saved when the rapture comes.

On Monday morning, I started listening to the BS Report with Bill Simmons and Chuck Klosterman. While I should have been giddy with the opportunity to listen to my two favorite writers talk for two hours, they also started talking about Duke basketball and naturally segued to Notre Dame football. Which must be some sort of FCC requirement I don’t know about.

SIDEBAR #2: Chuck made an interesting point about the hatred of Duke deriving from some sort of reverse-racism that because Duke has an inordinate amount of white players and some of them were annoying (Laettner, Christian; Hurley, Bobby; Wojoczeheyskyzczheiy, Steve) we have assigned a level of ‘douche-i-ness’ to any white player as soon as they get on the Duke floor. This may have validity, although I should admit that despite being a white guy of average height, all of my least favorite basketball players have been white guys of average height – Dookie or non-Dookie – I’m looking at you John Stockton.

Simmons made the argument that people of a certain age will always overrate Notre Dame because as they were growing up, Notre Dame was always successful. I have made this argument myself before so I really shouldn’t have a problem with it but that was when talking about dinosaurs like Beano Cook.

Simmons and Klosterman are around 39-40 years old, roughly 5 years older than me. The fact that they have been brainwashed to think ‘Notre Dame’ was successful for their entire lives just speaks to the power of a media repeating a storyline long enough.

Let’s set the record straight on the ‘continued greatness of Notre Dame’.

- Notre Dame’s last national championship was in 1988

- Their last national championship before 1988 was 1977

- The last time Notre Dame was truly relevant to the National Championship conversations was 1993, when they lost at home to Boston College and cost themselves a national championship game appearance (on behalf of Seminole nation – thank you for that). 1993 was seventeen years ago.

- Notre Dame’s football record since 1975: 274 wins, 139 losses. A winning percentage of .663. On a twelve game season that breaks down to an average record of about 8-4.

- Six times since 1975 has Notre Dame had a season record with one loss or less. The last time: 1993.

- Notre Dame’s all-time Bowl record: 14-15

- Notre Dame did not win a bowl game from 1995 to 2008. Losing 9 straight. The streak breaking win was a defeat of 7-5 Hawaii in the Hawaii Bowl.

In every conceivable way, for my entire lifetime Notre Dame has been a mediocre football program. They have occasionally had good teams that even won a couple national titles, most recently twenty years ago. But for the other 85% of the time, they are at best above average, at worst truly awful.

Which, in my book puts them on par with schools like Colorado, Clemson and Tennessee.

Can we please, please stop this myth that Notre Dame has been a great football program for all time?

Yes, they were a great team from the 1920s all the way through the 1960’s. But then so was Army who won three straight national titles in the 1940’s. Minnesota won a share of 3 straight national titles in the 1930’s, two more in the 1940’s and another in 1960. The Golden Gophers even beat Alabama in the 2004 Music City Bowl. Yet, no one will ever go on the air and talk about Minnesota’s continued dominance of national football.

All of these national media types need to stop perpetuating the myth of Notre Dame football. They haven’t been great for twenty years. They aren’t relevant now.

If you insist on forcing down our throats never-ending hype about an occasionally decent football team from a religious school that last won a national title in the 1980’s that is fine.

Just try to mix it up and talk about BYU on occasion.

{ 2 comments }

Introducing the Acting Combine All Stars

by dave on March 4, 2010

This week is sort of like the bizarro version of the week in April that starts with the college basketball national championship game and MLB Opening Day and ends with Sunday at the Masters. Rather than being book-ended by some of the great events of the year, this week is book-ended by two of the most overblown events on the calendar: the NFL Combine and the Oscars.

While my disdain for the NFL Combine is well documented (just scroll down to the last two posts), I actually enjoy the Oscars and for the first time in years I have actually seen one of the best picture nominees (I will be cheering for you Quentin).But I also recognize that the Oscars are a little ridiculous, often ignoring the real best work done in favor of choices made for reasons like popularity, politics or just because someone has already won (see: Russell Crowe from Gladiator over Tom Hanks from Castaway – the Oscar version of Barkley over MJ for MVP – he was alone for the entire movie and made you care about a freaking volleyball!).

Anyway, in honor of the Oscars and the Combine I started thinking about how the phenomenon of the NFL Combine wunderkind also applies in Hollywood. An Acting Combine All-Star if you will.

If you want to play along at home, here is how you spot an Acting Combine All-Star (ACAS). There are three key elements to becoming an ACAS. An ACAS will: (1) Inexplicably star in a ton of movies despite (2) none of their movies doing very well at the box office and (3) their being horrible actors and horrible in every one of their films.

It is that simple. Despite hours of film that proves they aren’t good at their chosen profession they are still highly regarded because of some measurable seen by the executives in charge. Much like combine stars.

When I started thinking about this and who could potentially qualify, one name immediately jumped to mind. To quote him:

All right, all right, all right.

Matthew McConaughy is the poster child for the ACAS team.

While anecdotally I knew this to be true – that Matthew hasn’t made a decent film since his epic turn as Wooderson in Dazed and Confused – I couldn’t just throw out something like that without some quantitative data to back it up.

I hate those web sites where people just throw out definitive statements with no proof whatsoever.

Thanks to a totally awesome website (www.the-numbers.com) I was able to verify Matt’s ACAS credentials. Matt has starred in 28 movies that have in total brought in $1.171B in gross box office receipts (GBOR). On first glance that seems impressive, he has a “B” for billion in there. Not bad.

However, when you do the math, he has only a $41m average worldwide gross (AG) for each movie. In today’s bloated Hollywood that barely covers the cost of production.

It also doesn’t factor in movies where Matt was more of a supporting player – like Tropic Thunder which accounted for $188m (or 16%) of his total receipts.

Yet, despite having practically universally poor returns on every movie he makes, he continues to get cast in bad movie after bad movie.

He is the Jeff George of Hollywood. A guy who looks good on paper, seemingly having all the qualities that it takes to be a star – good looks, a seemingly likable personality and freakishly short arms to make him look better while shirtless (umm, let’s pretend I didn’t say that last one, ok?) – that continues to get work despite showing no results at all.

But Matt isn’t alone. After consultation with the PFB braintrust, here is my starting rotation of the ACAS team:

Kate Hudson – (17 movies / $873m GBOR / $51m AG) starring with fellow ACAS vet McConaughey in How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days and Fool’s Gold. An ACAS Perfect Storm!

NOTE: Amazingly How to Lose… was both Matt and Kate’s highest grossing star vehicle. So, maybe the secret is to not cast one ACAS team member but instead cast two – the whole is greater than the sum of its parts indeed.

Luke Wilson – (33 movies / $1.718b GBOR / $52m AG) hard to remember now but Mr. AT&T actually made movies before selling his indy-movie soul for that global telecom money. Of course, more people have seen him making Palin-esque arguments that have nothing to do with refuting the claims in the Verizon commercials than have seen Luke’s movies. His two highest grossing movies were Charlie’s Angels and…wait for it…Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle, dreadful movies in which he had a tiny role. Remove those from his total and his average worldwide gross drops to a sub-McConaughy $39m per movie

Ethan Hawke – (32 movies / $843m GBOR / $26m AG) Fifteen years ago, Ethan Hawke was a rebel, mumbling his way through hip movies like Reality Bites and Before Sunrise. They may have helped his Gen X cred, bagged him the scariest looking ‘beautiful woman’ in Hollywood and convinced studio executives that he is cool but they didn’t sell any tickets and certainly haven’t helped any of his movies since be any good. Speaking of his Ex…

Uma Thurman – (32 movies / $1.572b GBOR / $49m AG) I know she is generally considered a great beauty and all, but I don’t see it. Combine that with bad movies and wooden acting and you have a career that is best summed by the fact that her best character didn’t even have a name.

Sarah Jessica Parker – (27 movies / $1.305b GBOR / $48m AG) Nearly a third of all of her revenues came from the Sex And The City movie. Note, she also starred in Failure to Launch with…Matt McConaughy. This is becoming like Six Degress of Matthew McConaughy, I guess with all those shirtless scenes, he gets some sort of funk on all these actresses when he works with them – some combination of body odor and bad acting I presume.

Wesley Snipes – (30 movies / #1.373b GBOR / $45m AG) OK, his legal problems the last few years probably hasn’t helped him but we forget all the horrid action movies he made (see Blade 1 – Blade 34, The Art of War, Murder at 1600) since he made Wildcats, Major League and White Men Can’t Jump. If he really was an NFL player, Wesley would’ve started his first two games before blowing out his ACL and limping through another 12 years as a special teams player refusing to retire.

Jean Claude Van Damme – (21 movies / $728m GBOR / $34m AG) – the Tony Mandarich of our list. He was big news in the early 90’s and rode large amounts of steroids to early stardom despite no talent what so ever.

Dane Cook – (10 movies / $336m GBOR / $34m AG) It was just a couple years ago that Dane Cook took his non-comedic comedy routine to the big screen and appeared in what seemed like 14 movies in the span of one year. Apparently it was only 10 movies. Yet, they all sucked. Was his massive suckitude found out in that time or he is just on a hiatus right now in between movies?

I think we can agree that we hope that all of the above are on a permanent hiatus.

But based on experience, I would guess they probably aren’t.

{ 3 comments }