Introducing the Acting Combine All Stars

by dave on March 4, 2010

This week is sort of like the bizarro version of the week in April that starts with the college basketball national championship game and MLB Opening Day and ends with Sunday at the Masters. Rather than being book-ended by some of the great events of the year, this week is book-ended by two of the most overblown events on the calendar: the NFL Combine and the Oscars.

While my disdain for the NFL Combine is well documented (just scroll down to the last two posts), I actually enjoy the Oscars and for the first time in years I have actually seen one of the best picture nominees (I will be cheering for you Quentin).But I also recognize that the Oscars are a little ridiculous, often ignoring the real best work done in favor of choices made for reasons like popularity, politics or just because someone has already won (see: Russell Crowe from Gladiator over Tom Hanks from Castaway – the Oscar version of Barkley over MJ for MVP – he was alone for the entire movie and made you care about a freaking volleyball!).

Anyway, in honor of the Oscars and the Combine I started thinking about how the phenomenon of the NFL Combine wunderkind also applies in Hollywood. An Acting Combine All-Star if you will.

If you want to play along at home, here is how you spot an Acting Combine All-Star (ACAS). There are three key elements to becoming an ACAS. An ACAS will: (1) Inexplicably star in a ton of movies despite (2) none of their movies doing very well at the box office and (3) their being horrible actors and horrible in every one of their films.

It is that simple. Despite hours of film that proves they aren’t good at their chosen profession they are still highly regarded because of some measurable seen by the executives in charge. Much like combine stars.

When I started thinking about this and who could potentially qualify, one name immediately jumped to mind. To quote him:

All right, all right, all right.

Matthew McConaughy is the poster child for the ACAS team.

While anecdotally I knew this to be true – that Matthew hasn’t made a decent film since his epic turn as Wooderson in Dazed and Confused – I couldn’t just throw out something like that without some quantitative data to back it up.

I hate those web sites where people just throw out definitive statements with no proof whatsoever.

Thanks to a totally awesome website (www.the-numbers.com) I was able to verify Matt’s ACAS credentials. Matt has starred in 28 movies that have in total brought in $1.171B in gross box office receipts (GBOR). On first glance that seems impressive, he has a “B” for billion in there. Not bad.

However, when you do the math, he has only a $41m average worldwide gross (AG) for each movie. In today’s bloated Hollywood that barely covers the cost of production.

It also doesn’t factor in movies where Matt was more of a supporting player – like Tropic Thunder which accounted for $188m (or 16%) of his total receipts.

Yet, despite having practically universally poor returns on every movie he makes, he continues to get cast in bad movie after bad movie.

He is the Jeff George of Hollywood. A guy who looks good on paper, seemingly having all the qualities that it takes to be a star – good looks, a seemingly likable personality and freakishly short arms to make him look better while shirtless (umm, let’s pretend I didn’t say that last one, ok?) – that continues to get work despite showing no results at all.

But Matt isn’t alone. After consultation with the PFB braintrust, here is my starting rotation of the ACAS team:

Kate Hudson – (17 movies / $873m GBOR / $51m AG) starring with fellow ACAS vet McConaughey in How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days and Fool’s Gold. An ACAS Perfect Storm!

NOTE: Amazingly How to Lose… was both Matt and Kate’s highest grossing star vehicle. So, maybe the secret is to not cast one ACAS team member but instead cast two – the whole is greater than the sum of its parts indeed.

Luke Wilson – (33 movies / $1.718b GBOR / $52m AG) hard to remember now but Mr. AT&T actually made movies before selling his indy-movie soul for that global telecom money. Of course, more people have seen him making Palin-esque arguments that have nothing to do with refuting the claims in the Verizon commercials than have seen Luke’s movies. His two highest grossing movies were Charlie’s Angels and…wait for it…Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle, dreadful movies in which he had a tiny role. Remove those from his total and his average worldwide gross drops to a sub-McConaughy $39m per movie

Ethan Hawke – (32 movies / $843m GBOR / $26m AG) Fifteen years ago, Ethan Hawke was a rebel, mumbling his way through hip movies like Reality Bites and Before Sunrise. They may have helped his Gen X cred, bagged him the scariest looking ‘beautiful woman’ in Hollywood and convinced studio executives that he is cool but they didn’t sell any tickets and certainly haven’t helped any of his movies since be any good. Speaking of his Ex…

Uma Thurman – (32 movies / $1.572b GBOR / $49m AG) I know she is generally considered a great beauty and all, but I don’t see it. Combine that with bad movies and wooden acting and you have a career that is best summed by the fact that her best character didn’t even have a name.

Sarah Jessica Parker – (27 movies / $1.305b GBOR / $48m AG) Nearly a third of all of her revenues came from the Sex And The City movie. Note, she also starred in Failure to Launch with…Matt McConaughy. This is becoming like Six Degress of Matthew McConaughy, I guess with all those shirtless scenes, he gets some sort of funk on all these actresses when he works with them – some combination of body odor and bad acting I presume.

Wesley Snipes – (30 movies / #1.373b GBOR / $45m AG) OK, his legal problems the last few years probably hasn’t helped him but we forget all the horrid action movies he made (see Blade 1 – Blade 34, The Art of War, Murder at 1600) since he made Wildcats, Major League and White Men Can’t Jump. If he really was an NFL player, Wesley would’ve started his first two games before blowing out his ACL and limping through another 12 years as a special teams player refusing to retire.

Jean Claude Van Damme – (21 movies / $728m GBOR / $34m AG) – the Tony Mandarich of our list. He was big news in the early 90’s and rode large amounts of steroids to early stardom despite no talent what so ever.

Dane Cook – (10 movies / $336m GBOR / $34m AG) It was just a couple years ago that Dane Cook took his non-comedic comedy routine to the big screen and appeared in what seemed like 14 movies in the span of one year. Apparently it was only 10 movies. Yet, they all sucked. Was his massive suckitude found out in that time or he is just on a hiatus right now in between movies?

I think we can agree that we hope that all of the above are on a permanent hiatus.

But based on experience, I would guess they probably aren’t.

{ 3 comments }

Fresh off my incessant whining about the ludicrousness (no, not LUDAcrisness, I mean the bad kind) of the NFL Combine, I should move on to another topic today. But I can’t yet, there were two more stories that came out of the Westminster Dog Sh…I mean NFL Combine that I want to look at. Two topics that re-affirm my low opinion of people running most NFL teams and make me realize that NFL GMs are more like politicians than we realize. They are so insulated from real life and common sense that they lose all understanding of reality and only listen to the small circle of like-minded minions surrounding them.

Reason #4,736 I could be an NFL GM

Ok, I guess I should start by noting my blatant bias toward Myron Rolle. Not only did he attend my alma mater but also represents everything anyone (athlete or non-athlete) should aspire to be. He is incredibly intelligent and driven by an ambition to help others rather than just make money.

So it is absolutely mind-blowing to me that some NFL GMs actually look down on his academic accomplishments and his interest in the broader world. This is actually considered a negative. Some of the dumber NFL GMs out there (or Millen-esque GMs if you will) believe all of this ‘learning’ and ‘education’ and ‘intellectual curiosity’ show that Myron is not capable of being the mindless football machine that they want.

Apparently Sarah Palin is having a greater influence on NFL teams than we realized.

These guys see Myron graduating in 2 and a half years and spending a year studying at Oxford as a negative. He deserted his team and doesn’t have the focus on football.

This line of thinking ignores that his accomplishments actually mean Myron is incredibly intelligent, hard working, capable of balancing strenuous study loads while also having the full time job that is college football and driven to be his best. These are qualities NFL teams don’t want in their players? Intelligence, a work ethic and an internal drive to be great?

Yes, in the minds of these GMs, it would be much better if Myron focused all of his brain on football and rather than spending his extra time studying anthropology and preparing for a post-NFL career as a surgeon helping the underprivileged in the Bahamas, he run a dog-fighting ring or hit the clubs with a gun in his sweat pants or after said night at club run over pedestrians. According to NFL leadership, that is a much better use of his time.

If any NFL GM passes over Myron in the draft next month simply because he studied at Oxford and is smarter than that GM, I implore the owner of that team to fire him on the spot. NFL team owners are typically smart, savvy businessmen (thus can afford to purchase an NFL team). If they can’t see what Myron Rolle could bring to their team (on and off the field) then I need to find a new sport to care about.

I can’t support self-important, delusional idiots.

(see Sarah Palin joke above).

Reason #4,737 I could be an NFL GM

 In the limited coverage of the NFL Combine I have watched, one of the big winners is former Maryland offensive lineman Bruce Campbell. You probably don’t know who that is**. Which makes sense, as Campbell should not be worth spending much time thinking about. He started for a season and a half at Maryland and did not make any All-ACC teams yet declared for the draft this spring after his junior year. As Profootballtalk describes Campbell’s game film:

One league source tells us that multiple teams have applied a round-four grade on Campbell, based on evaluation of his college game film.  Another league source described Campbell’s game film as “terrible.”

Rotoworld piled on as well:

Saturday, the NFL Network showed numerous clips of Campbell missing blocks and getting overpowered at the point of attack.

So why should we care about this, sad, mis-guided soul who was apparently talked into turning pro way too early despite showing no reason for doing so?

Well, because apparently Bruce can run fast and is strong.

Here is ESPN and Scouts, Inc.’s Todd McShay (Insider subscription required)

Maryland OT Bruce Campbell has become the top workout warrior of the 2010 class, confirming everything we thought about his strength and athletic ability coming into the NFL combine.

Campbell ran an official 4.85-second 40-yard dash, turned in a 32-inch vertical jump and put up 34 repetitions on the standard 225-pound bench press.

He needs to play with better balance, his technique needs polishing and he has trouble staying healthy, but this showing proves that Campbell is blessed with rare physical tools and should make him a lock to come off the board in the bottom half of Round 1.

Read all of that again. He did nothing in college to the point he was dominated by other players (and the ACC isn’t exactly the SEC, you know?), he hasn’t been able to stay healthy yet next month, some team is going to probably draft him in the first round and pay him millions of dollars to either sit on the bench or get dominated by defensive linemen and possibly get their quarterback killed.

All because he spent the last two months working on the specific skills measured at the Combine.

I am guessing I am younger than just about every single NFL GM, yet apparently I am the only one that remembers the names Tony Mandarich and Mike Mamula. There was even film of Mandarich doing well and he was a bust because he was drafted more on his physical skills than what he accomplished on the field.

In an industry that spends millions of dollars analyzing every single aspect of every little thing – where every play of every game is broken from 5 different angles and gameplans are more complicated than the plot of Lost – how can the same draft mistakes be repeated over and over again?

Are NFL GMs just that dumb or are they so arrogant that they believe ‘I am much smarter than the people that made those mistakes, I know better’.

That was a serious question. I really don’t understand.

Because based on the math as I understand it, for the NFL it is much better to be a failure on the field that spends two months learning how to run, jump and bench press than it is to be a success on the field but have the intellect and interests to want to learn about the world outside the stadium.

** UPDATE: I am ashamed to admit that in my rush to get this post up, I neglected the greatness that is the original Bruce Campbell. I may be one of three or four people in America that still looks back fondly at The Adventures of Brisco County Jr. but I think we can all agree that Bruce being attacked by his own hand in Evil Dead Two eclipses anything this new Bruce Campbell will ever do on the NFL field.

{ 4 comments }